Save Crow's Nest Voter Guide,
2007 Supervisor Election
Overall Grade | Candidate |
Candidate
Name: Harry Crisp District:
George Washington Incumbent (yes/no): No Party affiliation: Democratic Website: HarryCrisp.com |
|
Total Herons | 9 |
Total Bulldozers | 0 |
Grade | Question |
Question
1. Previously,
the State of If
elected, will you vote in favor of SCN
position: YES. Save Crow’s Nest helped prepare the loan
application and solicited letters from our members on behalf of the loan
application. Candidate
response: YES. |
|
Question
2. In the
1970s, a large portion of Crow’s Nest was rezoned to an A-2
designation, which allows one house per acre. This land use designation
is for transitional areas of the County that are served by either public
water or public sewer. None of the properties on Crow’s Nest are
served by public water or public sewer, and almost all of the properties
on and surrounding the peninsula are zoned A-1, which requires 3 acres
per house. If
elected, will you vote in favor of “right zoning” land on the
Crow’s Nest peninsula to A-1 agricultural land use? SCN
position: YES. This is a position that
Save Crow’s Nest has repeatedly advocated in favor of. See #2 from
this 2005 piece, "10 Things Stafford
County Supervisors can do now to help save Crow's Nest." Candidate response: YES. |
|
Question
3. Creeks
surrounded by steep slopes and highly erodible soils are dominant on
Crow’s Nest. These landscape conditions necessitate the use of
cut-and-fill development practices and have significant negative impacts
on water quality. Although prevention is considerably more economical
than mitigation, this year the Board of Supervisors voted to kill Water
Resource Overlay legislation. This ordinance would have protected
sensitive water resources such as those on Crow’s Nest. If
elected, will you vote in favor of the Water Resource Overlay ordinance,
and vote in favor of designating all of the land on the peninsula east
of SCN position: YES. Save Crow’s Nest testified in favor of this legislation, which was effectively killed in 2007 in a 4-3 vote. See Water Resource Protection Overlay on the Stafford County Supervisors' Report Card.
Candidate
response: YES. |
|
Question
4. There are many historical
and cultural resources on the Crow’s Nest peninsula. For
example, an October 2005 archaeological survey of only a small portion
(450 acres) of Crow's Nest identified 47 new archaeological sites, 14 of
which meet the criteria for listing on the National Registrar of
Historic Places. The County has an existing ordinance, the Historical
Resource District Overlay, which could be used to facilitate protection
of these resources, but so far has not designated any part of Crow’s
Nest as an historical district. If
elected, will you vote in favor of designating
all of the land on the peninsula east of SCN
position: YES. This is a position that
Save Crow’s Nest has repeatedly advocated in favor of. As stated in
testimony before the Board of Supervisors on June 5, 2007, "the
Board could designate the entire peninsula as a historic resource. There
are numerous cultural and historical resources on the peninsula. A "Phase
I" archaeological study of 450 acres on the eastern half of the
Crow's Nest peninsula identified 47 new archaeological sites—14 of
which meet the criteria for listing on the National Registrar of
Historic Candidate response: YES. |
|
Question
5. Crow’s
Nest provides an extraordinary habitat for a variety of animals and
plants, in part due to the contiguous nature of the property. There have
been some suggestions that a cluster development, which would increase
the building density on one part of the property and leave a portion of
the property in open space, is one solution to Crow’s Nest. This would
fragment the property and destroy wildlife habitat. If
elected, will you vote in favor of a plan for a cluster development on
Crow’s Nest? SCN
position: NO.
Building dense residential development on Crow’s Nest will not
“save” it. Candidate response: NO. |
|
|
Question
6 and question 7. The Crow’s Nest Harbour is an area of
almost 1,000 acres that was subdivided into lots in the 1970’s. There
is a deed restriction on the lots in Crow’s Nest Harbour which
prohibits the use of well water. Currently, there are not any plans to
extend public water or sewer to the Crow’s Nest peninsula. 6.
If elected, will you vote in favor of extending public water to
the Crow’s Nest area? SCN position: NO. Candidate
response: NO. 7.
If elected, will you vote in favor of lifting the deed
restriction? SCN position: NO. Candidate
response: NO. |
Question
8. The current Board of Supervisors has at various times
voted in favor of road projects that will facilitate development of
Crow’s Nest. These projects include the reconstruction of Courthouse
(almost completed) and Andrew Chapel Roads, the reconstruction of the
bridge on Courthouse Road, the hard surfacing of Rt 609/Raven Rd (the
road that runs through Crow’s Nest), and a proposal to rebuild the
bridge on Raven Rd at the entrance of Crow’s Nest. If
elected, will you vote in favor of removing the Andrew Chapel, bridge
replacement and Candidate response: YES. |
|
Question
9. The current Board of Supervisors passed the “Traditional
Neighborhood Development” ordinance, which allows dense residential
development. One project submitted under this ordinance, Stafford Town
Station, proposes to place up to 2,250 housing units on land currently
approved for 145 homes, and in exchange, provide money from cash
proffers that might be used to assist in the purchase of Crow’s Nest.
Another developer has had an option to purchase portions of Crow’s
Nest and has actually purchased lots in Crow’s Nest Harbour. That
developer has suggested at various times an exchange of protected
property on Crow’s Nest for dense residential development—up to
12,000 housing units--on Widewater. Both
these proposals would create more housing units than can be built on
Crow’s Nest. If
elected, will you vote in favor of rezonings for dense residential
development in exchange for the protection of a portion of Crow’s Nest
if those rezonings will create more housing units than can be built on
Crow’s Nest? SCN
position: NO. Save Crow’s Nest is
opposed to saving Crow’s Nest “at any cost,” meaning that we do
not support a bad deal for taxpayers. See "Not
in the name of Crow's Nest." Candidate response: NO> |
|
What else would you like the
members of Save Crow’s Nest and other voters to know about your
position on Crow’s Nest? Candidate statement: I
firmly believe in taking measures now to protect and conserve Stafford's
natural, historical, and agricultural resources.
The most valuable of all of these is Crow's Nest.
I pledge to do my utmost to see that it is protected! |